Impaired fetal growth drives high rates of cesarean delivery after failed trial of labor
نویسندگان
چکیده
Some growth restricted fetuses may not tolerate labor. We performed causal-mediation analysis, an innovative statistical methodology, to quantify the impact of small for gestational age (SGA) birth, a surrogate fetal restriction, and (GA) at delivery on risk cesarean after failed trial labor (TOL). large cross-sectional analysis all para 0 patients who delivered non-anomalous, singleton live births from 22-42 weeks’ gestation in US (2015-2019). The primary outcome was any labor, termed “failed TOL.” exposure SGA birth (sex-specific birthweight < 3rd [SGA3] 5th [SGA5] percentiles GA). causal mediation GA association between (exposure) TOL (outcome). Of 5,422,214 subjects, n=195,123 (3.6%) were SGA3, n=342,315 (6.3%) SGA5, n=4,726,980 (87.2%) AGA. Overall risks weeks higher SGA3 SGA5 (16.9% 15.7%, respectively) compared AGA (14.3%). by strata revealed similar rates versus prior 32 weeks, but notable increased (TABLE 1). Using 39 as reference, that (the controlled direct effect) driver this disparate risk, especially 37-38 41 weeks. Associations (data shown). Compared births, are TOL. This appears be result SGA, delivery. Further study is needed identify with pathologic avoid morbidity TOL.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)
منابع مشابه
Trial of labor after cesarean section.
Background The AAFP convened a panel to systematically review the available evidence on trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) using the Agency for Healt Report on Vaginal Birth after Cesarean (VBAC) along with additional literature review. The panel developed a comprehensive, evidence-based guideline for Trial of Labor after Cesarean (TOLAC), formerly Trial of Labor Versus Elective Rep...
متن کاملThe Effect of Previous Successful Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery on Subsequent Trial of Labor
Results: The study population comprised of four hundred-sixteen women with attempted VBAC. They were divided into two groups: 149 (35.82%) had no previous attempted VBAC and the last delivery was cesarean section (group 1), compared to 267 (64.2%) with previous ≥ 1 successful VBAC (group 2). The VBAC success rates were 86 % versus 95.5 % in groups 1 and 2 respectively (P=.001). Twenty-one (14.1...
متن کاملOutcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.
BACKGROUND The proportion of women who attempt vaginal delivery after prior cesarean delivery has decreased largely because of concern about safety. The absolute and relative risks associated with a trial of labor in women with a history of cesarean delivery, as compared with elective repeated cesarean delivery without labor, are uncertain. METHODS We conducted a prospective four-year observa...
متن کاملPredicting uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.
Uterine rupture is the most serious complication for women undergoing trial of labor (TOL) after prior cesarean delivery. While rates of uterine rupture vary significantly according to a variety of clinically associated risk factors, the absolute risk for this complication ranges between 0.5 and 4 percent. Previous vaginal delivery and prior successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery conf...
متن کاملMaternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis.
This study reviewed maternal morbidity following trial of labor (TOL) after cesarean section, compared with elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCS). Articles were pooled to compare women planning vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) with those undergoing ERCS with regard to maternal morbidity (MM), uterine rupture/dehiscence (UR/D), blood transfusion (BT), and hysterectomy. The former group was...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['1097-6868', '0002-9378', '1085-8709']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.11.305